John Brennan is backpedaling on comments he’s made that gave the president the right to fire him. The other night on the Rachel Maddow he tried to walk back his statement on Helsinki when he said:
Now, having read that, did he or did he not accuse President Trump of Treason? On Maddow he says that he said nothing short of treason. Well, what is nothing short of treason? It’s treason is it not. He also claims that Trump is in Putin’s pocket. Considering the fact that Brennan did absolutely nothing against Putin and Russia, what does that make him? In his shorts?
Host Rachel Maddow said, “After Helsinki, you were stark, and even a little bit scary in your criticism of his behavior. You said it rose to treason.”
Brennan responded, “I said it was nothing short of treasonous.”
Maddow then stated, “In this current controversy, that specific comment has been singled out by a number of people as a comment that maybe, by you, crossed the line, that was maybe –.”
Brennan cut in to respond, “Crossed what line?” He continued that he has a right to free speech
Maddow responded that she wasn’t questioning whether Brennan had the right to make those remarks, and then asked, “But do you stand by that consideration, and can you explain, can you elaborate what you mean by treasonous? It’s a very serious allegation.”
Brennan answered, “I know what the Russians did in interfering in the election. I have 100% confidence in what they did. And for Mr. Trump to stand on that stage in Helsinki, with all the world’s eyes upon him, and to basically [say] he wouldn’t — he doesn’t understand why would the Russians interfere in the election. He’s given Mr. Putin and the Russians a pass time after time after time, and he keeps referring to this whole investigation as a witch hunt, as bogus, as — and to me, this was an attack against the foundational principle of our great republic, which is, the right of all Americans to choose their elected leaders. And for Mr. Trump to so cavalierly just dismiss that, yes, sometimes my Irish comes out, and — in my tweets, and I did say that it rises to and exceeds the level of high crimes and misdemeanors and is nothing short of treasonous. … I didn’t mean that he committed treason, but it was a term that I used, nothing short of treasonous.”
John Brennan previously revealed classified information to the press. That is enough to pull his security clearance. And what about his argument that losing his security clearance prevents him from having free speech? Losing his clearance does absolutely nothing to prevent him from speaking out.